| Pages: [1] |
1. Lowsec, sec status and you. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Aqriue wrote: Suck it up buttercup. You don't have to fire on anyone, you don't have to pod them. If you do...well them's thar tha consequences of your actions pilgrim (/John Wayne drawl). Sec status is an F*cking joke for a punishment if you t...
- by Proteus Maximus - at 2011.12.13 00:20:00
|
2. System Defense Ships - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Vimsy Vortis wrote: People would just use them to run L4s. Not if they had system restrictions like capitols. No high sec..period.
- by Proteus Maximus - at 2011.12.13 00:15:00
|
3. Armor plates: The fix. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
+1 nice work sir.
- by Proteus Maximus - at 2011.12.09 18:45:00
|
4. Ability to look outside when in stations - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Sure you may peek outside.... long as I can shoot you in the face through the porthole. I thought it was simple..undock don't agress and redock. Insta-warp? Sorry but it just feels like you're fishing for an easy button.
- by Proteus Maximus - at 2011.10.08 02:02:00
|
5. Ships: right click -> Wrap for transport - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Quote: An unarmed ship needs to be added specifically to perform that task; that ship should have little to no cargo, and a ship maintenance bay large enough to hold 3 battleships. I fully support this idea and or product. +1
- by Proteus Maximus - at 2011.10.04 16:09:00
|
6. Novafox Shipyards version of Escort Carriers. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Fkin forum ate my post. In short your concept is excellent. My take on the same thing was a bit different. It was a turret/defender missile launching ship of the same size. Now before everyone scoffs at the idea I'll admit D-missiles suck atm. ...
- by Proteus Maximus - at 2011.10.04 15:49:00
|
7. Ships: right click -> Wrap for transport - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
>Crate for transport Fixed
- by Proteus Maximus - at 2011.10.04 01:14:00
|
8. The scurge of offline poses and a way to make them easier to kill - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Supported. Just show ccp where we touched you on the doll and every thing will be ok.
- by Proteus Maximus - at 2010.11.30 14:17:00
|
9. Tech2 Tier 2 Battlecruiser - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I have always wanted to see a strictly defensive escort carrier. Sub carrier/dread in size larger than a battleship. With out formations the idea is pretty unless how ever. A line of them fitted with batteries of artillery putting up walls of flac...
- by Proteus Maximus - at 2010.11.30 14:12:00
|
10. Drone swarms instead of drones - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I support & agree with this approach. In an attempt to address mixed drone flights. The ability to configure the swarm in a station interface. Maybe even in the fitting window. I am thinking drone slot layout replacing a bay. The only other alter...
- by Proteus Maximus - at 2010.11.30 14:00:00
|
11. Cure for Station Games - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Quote: I want CCP to nerf the people who don't play the way i want them to. This pretty much sums it up.^^^ Oh and I so I lol'ed...Thanks Just show ccp where we touched you on the doll and every thing will be ok.
- by Proteus Maximus - at 2010.11.30 13:41:00
|
| Pages: [1] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |